"They thought they had a deal, then they didn't have a deal," he said. On the eve of Tuesday's hearing, PG&E and lawyers for the victims filed a settlement amendment withdrawing the requirement that Newsom must approve the reorganization plan.įrank Pitre, a fire victims' lawyer who argued in favor of the settlement, told Montali Tuesday that Brown's disapproval and the jeopardy to the settlement "reopened all the wounds" for the victims. Gavin Newsom must find that PG&E's reorganization proposal meets the requirements of AB 1054, the law that created the wildfire fund.īut on Friday, Newsom announced he believes the plan lacks the management and financial changes needed to provide "safe, reliable, and affordable service." The settlement between PG&E and lawyers for wildfire victims originally included a provision that Gov. That plan also includes a similar $13.5 billion for victims for losses not compensated by insurance companies. Montali said a group of PG&E bondholders remains free to advocate a competing financial plan. "As for our overall plan of reorganization, we remain engaged in active and constructive dialogue with stakeholders," PG&E said. This brings us one significant step closer to getting victims paid so they can rebuild their lives. It said in a statement Tuesday, "Today marks an important milestone - the bankruptcy court has approved our settlement agreements resolving all major wildfire claims. PG&E filed in January for the Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, which enabled it to freeze its debts and proceedings in lawsuits while developing a financial plan. The utility is seeking to emerge from Chapter 11 bankruptcy by a June 30 deadline to be eligible for a new fund established by the state Legislature to cushion utilities' liability for future wildfire claims. The approvals enable PG&E to continue with a proposed financial reorganization plan to exit bankruptcy court. The report provides an analysis of historical performance and concludes with policy and operational recommendations.Lawyers said during the hearing that there are 70,000 claims pending against the San Francisco-based utility. Following this overview, the plan will discuss topics such as community risk assessment, critical task analysis, agency service level objectives, and distribution and concentration measures. This report will begin with an overview of both the community and the agency. The body of regulations for the fire service provides that if fire services are provided, it must be done with the safety of the firefighters and citizens in mind.Ĭreating a Standards of Coverage and Deployment Plan document requires that a number of areas be researched, studied, and evaluated. It is important to understand that there are no mandatory federal or state regulations directing level of service, fire service response times, or outcomes. Although the districts serve a larger area, those areas are served by contract with other entities. This report focuses on the area within the boundaries of the two fire districts. The purpose for completing such a document is to assist the agency in ensuring a safe and effective response force for fire suppression, emergency medical services, and specialty response situations. It follows closely the Center for Fire Public Safety Excellence (CPSE) Standards of Coverage model that develops written procedures to determine the distribution and concentration of a fire and emergency service agency’s fixed and mobile resources. In 2017 North Tahoe Fire Protection District and Meeks Bay Fire Protection District engaged the services of Emergency Services Consulting International (ESCI) to complete a comprehensive Standards of Coverage and Deployment Plan. The report found below serves as the North Tahoe Fire Protection District and Meeks Bay Fire Protection District Standards of Coverage and Deployment Plan.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |